So it’s possible that UCP might have proven less disappointing had additional time and resources been allocated to its testing.)Ī good example of an environment-specific pattern family is CONCAMO. A better version was developed later and is known as the AOR-Universal camouflage pattern. (To be fair, UCP was fielded without the benefit of proper testing. Perhaps this was a good thing because it allowed the makers of modern camouflage to recognise that pan-environment effectiveness was unattainable and that what was needed instead to achieve better performance in widely different landscapes was more specialized versions. However, UCP did not live up to its promise. Army’s 2004-19 Operational Camouflage pattern. What emerged was CADPAT/MARPAT, America’s UCP, which you might know as the U.S. This, they hoped, would result in an effective all-in one pattern. The Americans had the idea that they would take the colour scheme that performed best in each scenario and combine them into a single pattern. A total of four camouflage patterns were selected for testing in the three scenarios-woodland, desert, and urban-under day and night conditions. That year and continuing until 2004, the Americans investigated potential replacements for their then-active Woodland and Desert camouflage uniforms. military’s Universal Camouflage Pattern (UCP, for short). There’s more to this dance than meets the eye.įor proof, let’s step back in time to the year 2002 and look at the effort to develop the U.S. Spoiler alert: you would be wrong to think that. So you might think that creating a new pattern variation is a “fire and forget” deal where you take the geometry, slap on a new colour scheme, and-voila-a new MultiCam variant is born. It so happens that the base geometry of MultiCam does this quite well. In the case of camouflage, geometrical design serves the purpose of breaking the wearer’s outline at closer distances. MultiCam’s variations weren’t easily createdĪ pattern's geometrical design is like the foundation of a building. And, indeed, they are-despite sharing the original MultiCam’s shortcoming of effective blending at longer distances. Given how well it performs, you’d naturally expect the newer MultiCam versions to be just as versatile. That’s why it’s called the “80-percent solution” for most environments. The original MultiCam pattern is known for its versatility. But all are united around a common theme, and that is to make the MultiCam family appealing as an overall solution. However, each variation is designed for maximum effectiveness in a specific environment.ĭifferent versions, yes. All are based on an identical geometrical design. There currently are five versions of MultiCam. Breakdown of MultiCam’s four added versions.MultiCam’s variations weren’t easily created.Ensure there is no wiggle or forward/backward movement once tight.With the recoil lugs engaged, tighten the screw to snug the anchor (approximately 18-20 Inch-lbs.Push the BCM Vertical Grip against rail, engaging the BCM Vertical Grip’s recoil lug to the intersecting Picatinny rail grooves.Grip can be installed in your desired orientation, angled forward or back. With the Picatinny anchor protruding, slide the BCM Vertical Grip onto the Picatinny rail until positioned in the desired location.Push tool into the screw to extend the Picatinny anchor, making it protrude from the top.Insert tool (T15 Torx™ driver) into the screw from under the BCM 1913 Vertical Grip.Tools needed: T15 Torx Driver (not supplied) Made in the U.S.A., manufactured from high quality, impact resistant polymers.Anchor and bolt system offers a simple robust design, while maintaining a lightweight 1.9 ounces.Flat sides with aggressive texture give better yaw control to the shooter during firing and non-firing manipulations.Can be mounted in reverse angle to increase control when grabbing handguard and grip.The forward angle increases the rigidity of the forearm, while providing a more natural wrist angle.Low-profile length for increased mobility and decreased “snag” factor.The BCM direct mount interface system reduces those issues and offers a more secure lockup, eliminating play in the mounting surface.ĭirect Attach Picatinny 1913 Rail Version Conventional mounting systems can allow for an increased amount of shifting and flexing of the accessory. BCM has developed a patent pending anchor system that not only secures to the mounting surface, but spreads the energy and force throughout the accessory. Most of the industry relies on a simple screw and backing nut for a mounting system.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |